500+ Manual Testing Interview Questions with Answers 2026

Detailed Exam Domain CoverageThis practice test repository is systematically organized to mirror the core competencies evaluated during professional Quality Assurance and Software Testing interview rounds.Testing Fundamentals (20%): Core principles of Software Testing, practical application of Verification vs. Validation, creating robust Test Cases, and identifying comprehensive Test Scenarios.Test Design and Execution (25%): Writing formal Test Plans, defining a Test Strategy, setting up a stable Test Environment, managing diverse Test Data, and systematically documenting Test Execution results.Defect Management (15%): Writing professional Bug Reports, navigating the complete Defect Lifecycle, working with Defect Tracking systems, validating Defect Resolution, and mastering cross-functional Collaboration with Developers.Testing Types and Levels (10%): Differentiating Black Box Testing and White Box Testing, and executing targeted rounds of Unit Testing, Integration Testing, and System Testing.Quality Assurance and Control (10%): Strategic Quality Assurance planning, tactical Quality Control execution, establishing a formal QA Process, analyzing QC Activities, and enforcing industry Standards and Best Practices.Communication and Collaboration (10%): Practicing Effective Communication across engineering units, Team Collaboration tactics, transparent Stakeholder Management, designing a Test Reporting framework, and tracking key Test Metrics.Tools and Technologies (5%): Navigating modern Test Management Tools, updating Defect Tracking Tools, understanding basic Automation Frameworks, validating backend data with SQL, and testing endpoints via API Testing.Real-World Scenarios and Problem-Solving (5%): Analyzing enterprise Case Studies, solving complex Scenario-Based Questions, handling interactive Problem-Solving Exercises, and building critical thinking and analytical skills under pressure.About the CourseSecuring a role as a QA professional in today’s competitive software landscape requires far more than memorizing basic terminology. Technical interviewers look for a tester's logical approach to edge cases, their ability to isolate defects cleanly, and their understanding of how testing fits into the broader software development lifecycle. I built this comprehensive practice test repository to give you an authentic preview of the challenging technical scenarios and behavioral puzzles you will encounter during actual interview loops.With 550 meticulously drafted, original questions, this resource moves past shallow definitions to focus heavily on practical application. You will face realistic challenges involving complex defect lifecycles, ambiguous requirements, boundary value choices, and cross-team bottlenecks with development squads. Every question is paired with a deep-dive, multi-layered technical breakdown that explains the underlying logic of the correct choice while clarifying why the subtle variations fall short. Whether you are a manual tester stepping up your career, an engineer moving from a non-technical background, or a QA veteran reviewing system integration testing principles before a senior-level board interview, this course provides the structured, high-intensity practice required to clear your upcoming rounds confidently on your first try.Sample Practice Questions PreviewTo understand the depth, formatting, and technical alignment of the resources inside this question bank, review these three high-fidelity sample questions.Question 1: Defect State Transition During Agile SprintsA manual tester identifies a critical functional defect where a checkout button fails to register user clicks on mobile viewports. The tester documents the issue thoroughly and moves the status to "New". The development lead reviews it, recognizes it as a known framework limitation that will be addressed in a major infrastructure overhaul next quarter, and changes the state. Which status should the defect assume based on standardized defect lifecycles?A) RejectedB) DeferredC) ClosedD) ReopenedE) FixedF) In ProgressCorrect Answer Explanation:Correct Answer: BExplanation:Correct Answer: B is correct because the "Deferred" status is specifically reserved for valid defects whose resolution is intentionally postponed to a subsequent release lifecycle or future development sprint due to business priorities, timeline constraints, or upcoming architectural changes.Why alternative options are incorrect:Option A is incorrect: "Rejected" is used when the development team asserts that the logged behavior is expected, works as intended, or is not a genuine software defect.Option C is incorrect: "Closed" implies that the bug has been fixed, thoroughly verified by QA, and successfully deployed.Option D is incorrect: "Reopened" is utilized when a previously fixed and verified defect surfaces again during regression testing rounds.Option E is incorrect: "Fixed" is an operational state assigned by the developer after they have modified the codebase but before QA validates the change.Option F is incorrect: "In Progress" denotes that an engineer is actively investigating or altering code to resolve the issue at that moment.Question 2: Applying Equivalence Partitioning to Form Input ValidationA registration form field accepts an input integer value representing a user's age, with valid registrations strictly restricted to individuals between 18 and 65 years old inclusive. When designing a black box test suite using Equivalence Partitioning, what is the minimum number of distinct partitions required to guarantee complete structural input coverage?A) One valid partition and one invalid partitionB) Two valid partitions and one invalid partitionC) One valid partition and two invalid partitionsD) Two valid partitions and two invalid partitionsE) Three valid partitions and zero invalid partitionsF) Three valid partitions and three invalid partitionsCorrect Answer Explanation:Correct Answer: CExplanation:Correct Answer: C is correct because Equivalence Partitioning breaks input data ranges into equivalent zones that the system handles similarly. For a valid range of 18 through 65, you must test: one valid partition (values from 18 to 65), one invalid partition below the range (values less than or equal to 17), and one invalid partition above the range (values greater than or equal to 66). This creates three total partitions (1 valid, 2 invalid).Why alternative options are incorrect:Option A is incorrect: Omitting either the lower or upper invalid boundaries leaves significant portions of the input logic completely unvalidated.Option B is incorrect: There is only one continuous valid zone specified by the business logic, not two separate valid groupings.Option D is incorrect: Splitting the valid range into two zones is unnecessary unless the system treats specific ages within that block differently.Option E is incorrect: Failing to include invalid inputs ignores crucial error-handling mechanisms and negative test workflows.Option F is incorrect: Over-segregating the data domains leads to redundant test execution without adding coverage or reducing risk.Question 3: Structural Validation Boundaries within Integration TestingDuring a system assembly phase, a QA engineer tests the transactional interface between an external payment processing gateway API and an internal accounting ledger module. The ledger module successfully records payments but drops the companion currency exchange metadata values, causing balancing mismatches. Which level and type of testing does this diagnostic scenario represent?A) Unit level testing utilizing a dynamic structural white box methodologyB) System level testing utilizing an exploratory black box methodologyC) Integration level testing utilizing a structural white box methodologyD) Integration level testing utilizing a functional black box methodologyE) Acceptance level testing utilizing a non-functional usability methodologyF) Regression level testing utilizing a static code analysis methodologyCorrect Answer Explanation:Correct Answer: DExplanation:Correct Answer: D is correct because the scenario evaluates the interaction and data integrity between two distinct subsystems (Integration Testing) by validating inputs and outputs against functional data expectations (Black Box Testing) without looking into the raw internal source code statements of either component.Why alternative options are incorrect:Option A is incorrect: Unit testing evaluates the smallest isolated pieces of code, like individual classes or procedures, rather than multi-module interface points.Option B is incorrect: System testing views the entire platform as a completed, unified product rather than focusing on specific module connections.Option C is incorrect: White box methodologies require direct insight, inspection, and coverage analysis of internal control paths, loops, and statement tracks.Option E is incorrect: Acceptance testing validates whether the software fulfills high-level business goals and user personas rather than analyzing data exchange formats.Option F is incorrect: Static analysis checks source code for syntax and structural compliance without executing the actual program.What to ExpectWelcome to the Interview Questions Tests to help you prepare for your Manual Testing QA Interview Questions Practice Test.You can retake the exams as many times as you wantThis is a huge original question bankYou get support from instructors if you have questionsEach question has a detailed explanationMobile-compatible with the Udemy appI hope that by now you're convinced! And there are a lot more questions inside the course.