[NEW] CCNP Service Provider Certification [2026]

CCNP Service Provider Certification Detailed Exam Domain CoverageThe 350-501 SPCOR (Implementing and Operating Cisco Service Provider Network Core Technologies) exam evaluates your expertise across several core domains. My practice tests are structured to cover these exact areas to ensure complete preparation:Service Provider Architecture Design (25%): Covers network topologies, Metro Ethernet, Carrier Ethernet design principles, MPLS L2VPN/L3VPN architectural models, Segment routing, and SDN integration.Routing Protocols Technologies for Service Providers (25%): Focuses on BGP scalability, path attributes, route reflection, IS‑IS and OSPF for large SP networks, MPLS label distribution (LDP, RSVP‑TE), routing convergence, and fast reroute mechanisms.Transport, QoS, and Traffic Engineering (25%): Includes QoS classification, marking, policing, and shaping, Carrier Ethernet QoS (IEEE 802.1p/q), MPLS QoS, MPLS traffic engineering, path selection, and Multicast transport for video services.Operations, Security, Automation (25%): Tests your knowledge of network management protocols (SNMP, NetFlow, sFlow), AAA frameworks (RADIUS, TACACS+, EAP), automation with NETCONF, YANG, scripting (Python/Ansible), and service assurance tools.Course DescriptionPassing the Cisco Certified Network Professional Service Provider (CCNP Service Provider) core exam requires more than just memorizing concepts. It demands a deep, practical understanding of how core service provider network technologies function, interact, and scale. I have designed this comprehensive practice test course to bridge the gap between theoretical study materials and the actual 350-501 SPCOR exam.Through my own experience in the field and navigating Cisco certifications, I know that practicing with highly accurate, scenario-based questions is the most effective way to guarantee a passing score. I have carefully authored this question bank to reflect the difficulty, format, and topics of the real exam.Rather than just telling you which answer is correct, I focus heavily on the "why." Every single question in this course includes an in-depth explanation that breaks down the core concepts, validates the correct choice, and thoroughly explains why the alternative options are incorrect. This method ensures you are genuinely learning the material—whether it is MPLS traffic engineering, BGP route reflection, or NETCONF automation—so you can walk into the testing center with complete confidence.Practice Questions PreviewHere is a sample of the type of rigorous questions and detailed explanations you will find inside the course:Question 1: BGP Scalability in Service Provider Networks An engineer is designing a large service provider core network using BGP Route Reflectors (RRs) to minimize the iBGP full-mesh requirement. To provide redundancy, two RRs are placed in the same cluster. Which mechanism prevents routing loops between these redundant Route Reflectors?Option A: The RRs append their own AS number to the AS_PATH attribute before reflecting the route.Option B: The RRs use the ORIGINATOR_ID attribute to drop routes they have locally generated.Option C: The RRs discard incoming BGP updates if the CLUSTER_LIST attribute contains their own local CLUSTER_ID.Option D: The RRs set the NEXT_HOP attribute to their own loopback address, preventing reverse reflection.Option E: The RRs rely on the MULTI_EXIT_DISC (MED) attribute to prioritize external paths over reflected paths.Option F: The RRs use the LOCAL_PREF attribute, setting it to 0 for all routes received from another RR in the same cluster.Correct Answer: Option CExplanation - Option A is incorrect: iBGP peers (including RRs) do not modify the AS_PATH attribute when passing updates within the same Autonomous System.Explanation - Option B is incorrect: While ORIGINATOR_ID is a loop prevention mechanism, it prevents a route from being sent back to the specific router that originally injected it into the AS, not between redundant RRs.Explanation - Option C is correct: When an RR reflects a route, it appends its CLUSTER_ID to the CLUSTER_LIST attribute. If an RR receives an update and sees its own CLUSTER_ID in the CLUSTER_LIST, it knows the route has looped back to its own cluster and discards it.Explanation - Option D is incorrect: RRs do not modify the NEXT_HOP attribute by default when reflecting routes; doing so would break standard iBGP routing behavior.Explanation - Option E is incorrect: MED is used to influence inbound traffic from an external AS, not for internal route reflection loop prevention.Explanation - Option F is incorrect: LOCAL_PREF is used to determine the best outbound path from an AS, and it is not manipulated by default for loop prevention between RRs.Question 2: MPLS Traffic Engineering When deploying MPLS Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE) in a service provider core, which protocol is specifically responsible for establishing the Label Switched Paths (LSPs) and reserving the necessary bandwidth across the network?Option A: LDP (Label Distribution Protocol)Option B: MP-BGP (Multiprotocol BGP)Option C: RSVP-TE (Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering)Option D: IS-IS with wide metrics enabledOption E: OSPFv3 with TE extensionsOption F: Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)Correct Answer: Option CExplanation - Option A is incorrect: LDP is used for standard, shortest-path label distribution but lacks the capability to reserve bandwidth or define explicit paths for Traffic Engineering.Explanation - Option B is incorrect: MP-BGP is used for distributing VPN labels and routing information (like L3VPN or VPLS), not for the underlying transport tunnel bandwidth reservation.Explanation - Option C is correct: RSVP-TE is an extension of RSVP used specifically in MPLS networks to establish explicit LSPs and reserve bandwidth along that path, satisfying strict QoS constraints.Explanation - Option D is incorrect: While IS-IS TE extensions (using wide metrics) distribute the topology and bandwidth availability information, the routing protocol itself does not reserve the bandwidth or signal the LSP.Explanation - Option E is incorrect: Similar to IS-IS, OSPF distributes the TE link state database but relies on a signaling protocol to actually build the path.Explanation - Option F is incorrect: SRv6 is a modern transport mechanism that can perform traffic engineering, but it uses IPv6 extension headers rather than signaling explicit bandwidth reservations node-by-node like RSVP-TE.Question 3: Quality of Service (QoS) A service provider is configuring QoS on the edge of their network to handle customer traffic. The engineer needs a mechanism that restricts traffic to a specific maximum rate and buffers the excess packets to smooth out bursts, rather than dropping them immediately. Which mechanism should be implemented?Option A: Traffic PolicingOption B: Traffic ShapingOption C: Weighted Random Early Detection (WRED)Option D: Class-Based Weighted Fair Queuing (CBWFQ)Option E: Strict Priority Queuing (PQ)Option F: Committed Access Rate (CAR)Correct Answer: Option BExplanation - Option A is incorrect: Traffic Policing restricts the traffic rate but typically drops (or marks down) excess packets immediately when the rate is exceeded; it does not buffer them.Explanation - Option B is correct: Traffic Shaping limits the rate of transmission and utilizes buffers to hold excess packets, transmitting them later to "shape" the flow and smooth out traffic bursts.Explanation - Option C is incorrect: WRED is a congestion avoidance mechanism that randomly drops packets before a queue becomes completely full; it does not dictate a maximum rate limit.Explanation - Option D is incorrect: CBWFQ is a scheduling mechanism that allocates bandwidth to different classes of traffic during congestion, not a tool for capping and buffering traffic to a specific maximum rate limit.Explanation - Option E is incorrect: Strict PQ ensures certain traffic (like voice) is sent first, but without an attached policer, it can starve other queues. It does not buffer and delay traffic to enforce a rate limit.Explanation - Option F is incorrect: CAR is a legacy method used primarily for rate-limiting via policing, meaning it drops excess traffic rather than buffering it.Course FeaturesWelcome to the Mock Exam Practice Tests Academy to help you prepare for your Implementing and Operating Cisco Service Provider Network Core Technologies (350-501 SPCOR) exam.You can retake the exams as many times as you want.This is a huge original question bank.You get support from instructors if you have questions.Each question has a detailed explanation.Mobile-compatible with the Udemy app.I hope that by now you're convinced! And there are a lot more questions inside the course.