[NEW] GIAC Certified Intrusion Analyst (GCIA)

Detailed Exam Domain CoverageThe GIAC Certified Intrusion Analyst (GCIA) exam validates your ability to monitor network traffic, analyze data, and detect active intrusions. To ensure you know exactly what to expect, this practice test course thoroughly covers all official exam domains:Network Traffic Analysis (30%): Packet capture and analysis (PCAP), protocol dissection (TCP/IP, UDP, ICMP), application layer protocol analysis (HTTP, DNS, SMTP), traffic pattern identification, and the use of analysis tools (Wireshark, tcpdump, SiLK).Intrusion Detection System (IDS) Configuration Management (25%): IDS rule creation and tuning (Snort, Zeek), signature development, sensor deployment strategies, log collection, correlation, and performance monitoring.Threat Intelligence Attribution (20%): Malware analysis basics, Indicator of Compromise (IOC) extraction, threat actor profiling, attack vector identification, and threat feed integration.Incident Response Forensics (15%): Incident handling procedures, network forensic data collection, evidence preservation, root cause analysis, and documentation.Network Forensics Reporting (10%): Flow data analysis (NetFlow, IPFIX), multi-source log correlation, timeline reconstruction, and compliance considerations.Course DescriptionWhen I started preparing for my own cybersecurity certifications, finding high-quality, realistic practice questions that actually mirrored the exam's difficulty was incredibly frustrating. I built this practice test course for the GIAC Certified Intrusion Analyst (GCIA) exam specifically to solve that problem.This question bank skips the generic trivia and focuses heavily on the core, practical competencies required to analyze network data and detect intrusions in the real world. You will work through complex scenarios involving PCAP analysis, protocol dissection, and signature development. By taking these mock exams, you will get hands-on exposure to dissecting application-layer protocols with Wireshark, tuning Snort and Zeek IDS rules, and reconstructing attack timelines using NetFlow data.I designed these tests to expose your knowledge gaps before exam day. Every single question includes a comprehensive explanation detailing exactly why the correct answer is right, and just as importantly, why the other options are wrong. My goal is to provide you with the most accurate study material possible so you can walk into the testing center with confidence and pass on your first attempt.Practice Questions PreviewQuestion 1: Network Traffic Analysis An analyst is reviewing a packet capture (PCAP) and notices a TCP packet sent to a web server (port 80) with the FIN, PSH, and URG flags set simultaneously. What type of activity does this traffic pattern most likely indicate?Option A: A standard TCP teardown sequence initiated by the client.Option B: An XMAS scan attempting to map open ports on the server.Option C: A NULL scan attempting to bypass a stateless firewall.Option D: A TCP keep-alive message sent by a load balancer.Option E: An active HTTP file transfer utilizing the PSH flag to clear the buffer.Option F: A SYN-ACK response indicating a half-open connection.Correct Answer: Option B Overall Explanation: The FIN, PSH, and URG flags set together are the defining characteristic of a TCP XMAS scan. Attackers use this technique to manipulate the TCP stack of a target system to determine if a port is open, closed, or filtered.Option A is incorrect: A standard TCP teardown uses the FIN and ACK flags, not FIN, PSH, and URG together.Option B is correct: Setting the FIN, PSH, and URG flags simultaneously lights the packet up "like a Christmas tree," which is the exact definition of an XMAS scan used in network reconnaissance.Option C is incorrect: A NULL scan is characterized by having absolutely no TCP flags set.Option D is incorrect: Keep-alive messages typically use ACK flags with no payload, or empty segments, not an anomalous combination of FIN, PSH, and URG.Option E is incorrect: While PSH is used to push data to the application layer during transfers, it is not combined with FIN and URG during active data transmission.Option F is incorrect: A SYN-ACK response will only have the SYN and ACK flags set during the second step of the TCP three-way handshake.Question 2: IDS Configuration Management You are writing a Snort rule to detect a specific directory traversal attack aiming for the /etc/passwd file via an HTTP GET request. Which of the following Snort rule options is the most efficient and accurate way to inspect the URI for this malicious string?Option A: content:"/etc/passwd"; http_client_body;Option B: content:"/etc/passwd"; http_header;Option C: content:"/etc/passwd"; http_uri;Option D: uricontent:"/etc/passwd"; nocase;Option E: pcre:"/\/etc\/passwd/"; http_cookie;Option F: content:"/etc/passwd"; depth:11;Correct Answer: Option C Overall Explanation: When writing Snort rules for HTTP traffic, utilizing HTTP modifiers ensures the detection engine only searches the specific buffer where the malicious payload is expected. This drastically improves performance and reduces false positives.Option A is incorrect: The http_client_body modifier inspects the payload body of the request (like a POST request). A GET request includes the target path in the URI, not the client body.Option B is incorrect: The http_header modifier inspects HTTP headers (like User-Agent or Host), not the actual requested URI path.Option C is correct: The http_uri modifier restricts the search specifically to the normalized URI buffer, making it the most efficient and accurate way to detect a directory traversal string in a GET request.Option D is incorrect: While uricontent is valid in older versions of Snort, modern Snort 2.x and 3.x best practices dictate using content paired with the http_uri modifier. Additionally, UNIX file paths are case-sensitive, so nocase could lead to unexpected behavior.Option E is incorrect: This option uses PCRE to search the http_cookie buffer. The target string is in the URI, not a cookie.Option F is incorrect: Using depth:11 restricts the search to the first 11 bytes of the entire payload. In an HTTP GET request, the URI is preceded by the method (e.g., GET ), so the string /etc/passwd will likely fall outside the first 11 bytes.Question 3: Incident Response Forensics During an incident response engagement, you are analyzing NetFlow v9 records to identify data exfiltration. You suspect an internal host is sending large amounts of data to an external, blacklisted IP address. Which specific NetFlow fields are most critical for confirming the volume and direction of the exfiltrated data?Option A: Source IP, Destination IP, and TCP Flags.Option B: Source IP, Destination IP, Bytes (IN_BYTES / OUT_BYTES), and Packets.Option C: Flow Start Time, Flow End Time, and Next-Hop IP.Option D: Source MAC Address, Destination MAC Address, and VLAN ID.Option E: Type of Service (ToS), Protocol, and Source Port.Option F: Autonomous System (AS) Number, Input Interface, and Output Interface.Correct Answer: Option B Overall Explanation: NetFlow is a standard for monitoring network traffic flows. To determine if data exfiltration occurred, an analyst must look at who communicated with whom (IP addresses) and the exact amount of data transferred (Bytes).Option A is incorrect: While TCP flags are helpful for understanding the state of the connection (e.g., if it was established), they do not indicate the volume of data transferred.Option B is correct: The Source IP and Destination IP confirm the internal host communicating with the blacklisted external IP. The Bytes and Packets fields provide the exact quantitative measurement of how much data was sent, confirming exfiltration volume.Option C is incorrect: Start and End times are crucial for building a timeline, and Next-Hop routing info is useful for network engineering, but neither confirms the volume of data exfiltrated.Option D is incorrect: MAC addresses and VLAN IDs only provide local Layer 2 information, which does not help track data volume crossing the perimeter to an external IP.Option E is incorrect: ToS, Protocol (e.g., TCP/UDP), and Source Port define the type of traffic, but lack the quantitative fields needed to prove massive data movement.Option F is incorrect: AS numbers and interface metrics are useful for perimeter routing diagnostics but do not directly quantify the session data volume between two specific endpoints.Welcome to the Mock Exam Practice Tests Academy to help you prepare for your GCIA.You can retake the exams as many times as you wantThis is a huge original question bankYou get support from instructors if you have questionsEach question has a detailed explanationMobile-compatible with the Udemy appI hope that by now you're convinced! And there are a lot more questions inside the course.